11:10 So, you know, we have a ton of people watching our videos on YouTube. We have a lot of people looking at our content on our website. It's tough to say, hey, was that the initial source? Was that the source that pushed him over the deal? When you're having discussions with CEOs, CFOs, how are you justifying the investment and giving them enough data to feel comfortable having faith that it's working even when you don't have as clean of data as other sources you might. That's a great question. I think attribution is one of these arguments that you can get into and just spin your wills with everyone that you mentioned, like almost endlessly.
11:55 Recently, I was at like a CMO group and there was a leader there that was just asking, you know, who still has the split level of like Piper revenue, like sales versus marketing versus other stuff. And a lot of like mixed hands were still up. But the general consensus, and this was, I would say, two years ago even, was that people don't really care that much anymore about like where stuff is coming from as long as there's pipe and rev. Obviously, you need to be able to measure and attribute probably more at the deal level, like where we think stuff came from.
12:30 But things like MQLs and searching for like super early signal, they're almost vanity metrics that marketers can use internally to just judge the health of their campaigns. Obviously, if you're looking at things like click through rates and conversion rates on a per campaign and per channel basis, that's going to give you the signal to like double down on an investment or discontinue an investment or a specific creative.
12:56 But once it hits the pipe stage, really just, you know, interview the folks that are creating the deals, have your rev ops team do their best to kind of build a model that everyone agrees upon to build attribution there and just reported at that stage. It's what we do at LightSource. We literally just look at, you know, the meetings that wash up and then the the actual AEs are saying, yeah, this came from an event, this came from marketing, this came from sales, this was a referral. People generally know and you can, again, have your rev ops folks like double check looking at the model. But I wouldn't really spend too much time or energy on it.
13:33 Like that's time and effort that you really should be spending if you're a marketer or seller or a GTM person going to get more of those deals. Like that's the name of the game. Enriching your content, making it better, researching the ICP, like those things are going to provide better results rather than like, oh, let's let's like dissect this attribution model and, you know, add all these algorithmic permutations to it. You know, maybe there are some like fully automated PLG emotions out there that can negate this mindset. I'm not working in that space.
14:03 But for a typical B2B SaaS, I wouldn't really spend a ton of time on it unless you're just drowning in deals to the extent that you, you know, have the time and energy to invest in complex attribution. Yeah, I think that makes a ton of sense. And usually we have really similar guidance at LeanScale because we're oftentimes on the hook of implementing attribution methods for these type of companies. And I agree for sales led growth, looking at the deal levels great or opportunity level and saying, hey, first, maybe first touch, last touch, keep it simple.